Threat modeling and threat intelligence are essential practices of a proactive security strategy. Occasionally, these terms can be confusing or mixed up because they sound similar (both start with “threat” – aren’t they the same?). Instead, these terms represent distinct and complementary approaches to understanding and mitigating cybersecurity risks. This blog post will explore their differences, how they complement each other, and how they can be integrated to provide a more secure posture for your organization.
What is Threat Modeling?
Threat modeling is a proactive approach to understanding, identifying, and addressing potential security threats to a system, application, or organization. It’s a security analysis technique that examines what could go wrong and how to prevent it.
Key Characteristics of Threat Modeling:
- Preventive/Forward-Looking: Threat modeling is ideally performed during the design phase or ongoing for an existing system as new features are created and before vulnerabilities can be exploited.
- System-Specific: The focus areas are on systems, applications, or business processes, analyzing their unique attack surfaces and potential weaknesses.
- Structured Frameworks/Methodologies: Common frameworks include STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) for application/system-centric threats and LINDDUN for privacy threats. PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) is a 7-step methodology.
The Threat Modeling Process:
- Understand the System: Create detailed diagrams showing system architectures, data flows, and trust boundaries
- Identify Threats: Use structured approaches to enumerate potential threats against each system component
- Assess Risk: Evaluate the likelihood and impact of identified threats
- Define Countermeasures: Develop specific controls and mitigations for high-priority threats
- Validate and Iterate: Continuously update the model as the system evolves